Huge Lacrosse Hit, Legal or Illegal?

Huge Lacrosse Hit, Legal or Illegal?

The Lynchburg player destroys the Hampden-Sydney player in the 2014 ODAC Men’s lacrosse championship game.

Stick Tap: Prodigy Launch

Posted in

Lacrosse Playground

In 2009, Adam O’Neill, Harry Alford and Thomas Alford launched Lacrosse Playground as the preeminent site for lacrosse gearheads. For years Lacrosse Playground provided lacrosse fans with tutorials and tips on how to string a lacrosse head, up-close looks at the gear the top players used and sneak peeks at equipment and uniforms before they were released. More than 10 years and millions of visits later, Lacrosse Playground has relaunched with a focus on storytelling. Our mission is to provide comprehensive coverage of the latest lacrosse news, share insights into the sports betting and fantasy lacrosse world and showcase the lifestyles and personalities of the sport of lacrosse through articles, videos and podcasts.

78 Comments

  1. richieeg3 on May 7, 2014 at 1:53 am

    Cross check. Great job with the shoulder placement but if your gonna extend through like that you gotta keep your hands together

  2. richieeg3 on May 7, 2014 at 1:53 am

    Cross check. Great job with the shoulder placement but if your gonna extend through like that you gotta keep your hands together

  3. richieeg3 on May 7, 2014 at 1:53 am

    Cross check. Great job with the shoulder placement but if your gonna extend through like that you gotta keep your hands together

  4. Travis Sevier on May 6, 2014 at 11:00 pm

    would have been legal if he didn’t extend his arms…still a good hit, his teammate set him up for that one.

  5. Travis Sevier on May 6, 2014 at 11:00 pm

    would have been legal if he didn’t extend his arms…still a good hit, his teammate set him up for that one.

  6. Shhhhhhhhhendo on May 6, 2014 at 4:52 pm

    Only reason I say it’s illegal is because he extended his arms after the hit

  7. MPowers1634 on May 6, 2014 at 4:03 pm

    In HS, it would be illegal…more than likely 2 minutes non-releasable, mainly due to the kid on the clear being defenseless.

  8. MPowers1634 on May 6, 2014 at 4:03 pm

    In HS, it would be illegal…more than likely 2 minutes non-releasable, mainly due to the kid on the clear being defenseless.

  9. MPowers1634 on May 6, 2014 at 4:03 pm

    In HS, it would be illegal…more than likely 2 minutes non-releasable, mainly due to the kid on the clear being defenseless.

  10. Nick on May 6, 2014 at 2:37 pm

    there was no actual penalty. ref called it clean, which it was.

  11. Nick on May 6, 2014 at 2:37 pm

    there was no actual penalty. ref called it clean, which it was.

  12. Shane on May 6, 2014 at 2:01 pm

    Should be legal. Great hit. But it’s illegal because he extended his arms through the hit. Lacrosse is getting soft

  13. nosfartYOU on May 6, 2014 at 11:16 am

    legal in canadian ball.

  14. anonymous on May 6, 2014 at 11:08 am

    guy caught it with his left….if he had the stick in the proper hand (right), then his back is shielding him, and the defender can’t get as clean of a shot

  15. Jamie on May 6, 2014 at 8:05 am

    Should be legal. At this level of the game these kind of hits are expected and athletes at this level should be in the kind of shape to where they can take hits like this. The player appeared to be fine, shaken up maybe, but it is a contact sport. If people really want the game to continue to grow, then clean agressive play should not be discouraged. The bad play was the pass and not the hit, the hit was a result of play below the talent level of the game. The other reality is that whether the hit should or shouldn’t be legal, in this situation, it will probably happen every time. Heads up play needs to be emphasided more and not argueing about if hits are legal or not. Teach young players to be aware of situations so that they can avoid big contact not make them believe that big contact isn’t a part of the game.

  16. Jamie on May 6, 2014 at 8:05 am

    Should be legal. At this level of the game these kind of hits are expected and athletes at this level should be in the kind of shape to where they can take hits like this. The player appeared to be fine, shaken up maybe, but it is a contact sport. If people really want the game to continue to grow, then clean agressive play should not be discouraged. The bad play was the pass and not the hit, the hit was a result of play below the talent level of the game. The other reality is that whether the hit should or shouldn’t be legal, in this situation, it will probably happen every time. Heads up play needs to be emphasided more and not argueing about if hits are legal or not. Teach young players to be aware of situations so that they can avoid big contact not make them believe that big contact isn’t a part of the game.

  17. Jamie on May 6, 2014 at 8:05 am

    Should be legal. At this level of the game these kind of hits are expected and athletes at this level should be in the kind of shape to where they can take hits like this. The player appeared to be fine, shaken up maybe, but it is a contact sport. If people really want the game to continue to grow, then clean agressive play should not be discouraged. The bad play was the pass and not the hit, the hit was a result of play below the talent level of the game. The other reality is that whether the hit should or shouldn’t be legal, in this situation, it will probably happen every time. Heads up play needs to be emphasided more and not argueing about if hits are legal or not. Teach young players to be aware of situations so that they can avoid big contact not make them believe that big contact isn’t a part of the game.

  18. Michael hamlet on May 6, 2014 at 5:57 am

    Only illegal because he extended his arms

  19. Michael hamlet on May 6, 2014 at 5:57 am

    Only illegal because he extended his arms

  20. JB on May 6, 2014 at 2:43 am

    Don’t even need to see the video… hands following through and up….. illegal

  21. JB on May 6, 2014 at 2:43 am

    Don’t even need to see the video… hands following through and up….. illegal

    • Jay on May 6, 2014 at 2:44 am

      watched the video and definitely illegal…

    • Jay on May 6, 2014 at 2:44 am

      watched the video and definitely illegal…

    • Jay on May 6, 2014 at 2:44 am

      watched the video and definitely illegal…

    • Jay on May 6, 2014 at 2:44 am

      watched the video and definitely illegal…

  22. JB on May 6, 2014 at 2:43 am

    Don’t even need to see the video… hands following through and up….. illegal

  23. Joe on May 6, 2014 at 2:16 am

    He made no play on the ball and hit a defenseless player. That’s a penalty. You can’t hit a defenseless player. Yes, it was a hospital pass, but there are rules that were instilled to protect players from taking hits like this one.

    • blaxx on May 6, 2014 at 7:47 am

      Yes, slight cross check so illegal, but otherwise a beautiful check!

    • blaxx on May 6, 2014 at 7:47 am

      Yes, slight cross check so illegal, but otherwise a beautiful check!

  24. Joe on May 6, 2014 at 2:16 am

    He made no play on the ball and hit a defenseless player. That’s a penalty. You can’t hit a defenseless player. Yes, it was a hospital pass, but there are rules that were instilled to protect players from taking hits like this one.

  25. Joe on May 6, 2014 at 2:16 am

    He made no play on the ball and hit a defenseless player. That’s a penalty. You can’t hit a defenseless player. Yes, it was a hospital pass, but there are rules that were instilled to protect players from taking hits like this one.

  26. NCAA on May 5, 2014 at 10:38 pm

    100% legal. No head to head, hit landed on the shoulder. 80% of the time will get called a penalty in the game today.
    -college lacrosse player

  27. NCAA on May 5, 2014 at 10:38 pm

    100% legal. No head to head, hit landed on the shoulder. 80% of the time will get called a penalty in the game today.
    -college lacrosse player

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

    • Degree getter on May 6, 2014 at 2:32 am

      If 80% of referees making that call, call it illegal… its probably illegal, at least by majority rule #America. Adjust your game or sit in the box.

  28. TonyPerkis on May 5, 2014 at 9:41 pm

    haha i love how #6 goes after #10 when he was the one who threw his buddy the hospital ball. This is a classic example of a big blow up hit that gets the fireworks nowadays even though there wasn’t much wrong with it. These females below want the cross-check and I guess I can kind of see it if you’re gonna whine about it. Otherwise I see a good lacrosse play where a kid leads with his shoulder. A shame that the game has come to this though. Penalty or not #6 owes his teammate a beer and an apology for throwing him a shitty ball.

    • Jarret on May 6, 2014 at 12:58 am

      agreed. I go to the school and live with 5 of them. huge ass clean hit off a buddy pass. Go tigers but to say this was anything but clean? come on now

    • Jarret on May 6, 2014 at 12:58 am

      agreed. I go to the school and live with 5 of them. huge ass clean hit off a buddy pass. Go tigers but to say this was anything but clean? come on now

    • Jarret on May 6, 2014 at 12:58 am

      agreed. I go to the school and live with 5 of them. huge ass clean hit off a buddy pass. Go tigers but to say this was anything but clean? come on now

  29. Struckanerve9 on May 5, 2014 at 9:34 pm

    Looked kind of like a cross check when he extended his arms through the hit with his hands apart on the shaft.

  30. Struckanerve9 on May 5, 2014 at 9:34 pm

    Looked kind of like a cross check when he extended his arms through the hit with his hands apart on the shaft.

    • Kristian on May 7, 2014 at 2:00 am

      That’s how you’re supposed to hit. Only a cross check if you don’t have you’re gloves on them.

    • Kristian on May 7, 2014 at 2:00 am

      That’s how you’re supposed to hit. Only a cross check if you don’t have you’re gloves on them.

  31. Jimmy Mac on May 5, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Should’ve been an easy non-releasable penalty. That’s the definition of a cross check, Kid didn’t used the shoulder, instead used the stick and arms with hands apart on the stick. If he would’ve ran through him with his shoulder I would make the argument that it’s legal even though he was defenseless, but since his hands are apart on the stick that right there should’ve made it an easy call.

  32. Jimmy Mac on May 5, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Should’ve been an easy non-releasable penalty. That’s the definition of a cross check, Kid didn’t used the shoulder, instead used the stick and arms with hands apart on the stick. If he would’ve ran through him with his shoulder I would make the argument that it’s legal even though he was defenseless, but since his hands are apart on the stick that right there should’ve made it an easy call.

  33. Jimmy Mac on May 5, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Should’ve been an easy non-releasable penalty. That’s the definition of a cross check, Kid didn’t used the shoulder, instead used the stick and arms with hands apart on the stick. If he would’ve ran through him with his shoulder I would make the argument that it’s legal even though he was defenseless, but since his hands are apart on the stick that right there should’ve made it an easy call.

  34. Jimmy Mac on May 5, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Should’ve been an easy non-releasable penalty. That’s the definition of a cross check, Kid didn’t used the shoulder, instead used the stick and arms with hands apart on the stick. If he would’ve ran through him with his shoulder I would make the argument that it’s legal even though he was defenseless, but since his hands are apart on the stick that right there should’ve made it an easy call.

  35. Jimmy Mac on May 5, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Should’ve been an easy non-releasable penalty. That’s the definition of a cross check, Kid didn’t used the shoulder, instead used the stick and arms with hands apart on the stick. If he would’ve ran through him with his shoulder I would make the argument that it’s legal even though he was defenseless, but since his hands are apart on the stick that right there should’ve made it an easy call.

  36. Jimmy Mac on May 5, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Should’ve been an easy non-releasable penalty. That’s the definition of a cross check, Kid didn’t used the shoulder, instead used the stick and arms with hands apart on the stick. If he would’ve ran through him with his shoulder I would make the argument that it’s legal even though he was defenseless, but since his hands are apart on the stick that right there should’ve made it an easy call.

  37. Jimmy Mac on May 5, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Should’ve been an easy non-releasable penalty. That’s the definition of a cross check, Kid didn’t used the shoulder, instead used the stick and arms with hands apart on the stick. If he would’ve ran through him with his shoulder I would make the argument that it’s legal even though he was defenseless, but since his hands are apart on the stick that right there should’ve made it an easy call.

  38. Jimmy Mac on May 5, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Should’ve been an easy non-releasable penalty. That’s the definition of a cross check, Kid didn’t used the shoulder, instead used the stick and arms with hands apart on the stick. If he would’ve ran through him with his shoulder I would make the argument that it’s legal even though he was defenseless, but since his hands are apart on the stick that right there should’ve made it an easy call.

  39. Coach B on May 5, 2014 at 8:16 pm

    I like it, so it must be illegal

  40. Coach B on May 5, 2014 at 8:16 pm

    I like it, so it must be illegal

  41. Coach B on May 5, 2014 at 8:16 pm

    I like it, so it must be illegal

  42. Coach B on May 5, 2014 at 8:16 pm

    I like it, so it must be illegal

  43. Coach B on May 5, 2014 at 8:16 pm

    I like it, so it must be illegal

  44. Coach B on May 5, 2014 at 8:16 pm

    I like it, so it must be illegal

  45. Jameel Young on May 5, 2014 at 7:44 pm

    Used to be legal, should still be legal, probably isn’t legal with today’s rules :/

  46. Jameel Young on May 5, 2014 at 7:44 pm

    Used to be legal, should still be legal, probably isn’t legal with today’s rules :/

  47. Jameel Young on May 5, 2014 at 7:44 pm

    Used to be legal, should still be legal, probably isn’t legal with today’s rules :/

  48. Jaxon Wright on May 5, 2014 at 7:37 pm

    illegal, looks like he might have started running early and the player catching the ball was not looking in that direction. this recently happened in a game i played in where a player looked to the left and was about to make a pass, when my teammate bodied up on him and it wouldve been clean, but the other player just wasnt looking

    • laxx on May 6, 2014 at 7:34 am

      what kinda a rule should that be???

    • laxx on May 6, 2014 at 7:34 am

      what kinda a rule should that be???

    • laxx on May 6, 2014 at 7:34 am

      what kinda a rule should that be???

  49. Jaxon Wright on May 5, 2014 at 7:37 pm

    illegal, looks like he might have started running early and the player catching the ball was not looking in that direction. this recently happened in a game i played in where a player looked to the left and was about to make a pass, when my teammate bodied up on him and it wouldve been clean, but the other player just wasnt looking

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.